Grizzly Bear Hunting Moratoriums in Canada

In March of 2006, the government of Albertaenvironmental groups alike when it came to
imposed a ban on the hunting of grizzly bears forpublishing the truth in order to truly measure
sport. The move showed a considerable lack ofpublic opinion. When commissioned by the
reaction when compared to a similar ban byInternational Fund for Animal Welfare to poll
British Columbia in 2001, and indeed a comparisonpeople's reaction to the ban, COMPASS directors
of the actions in the two provinces sheds a lot ofacted shocked when the numbers reflected a
light on the ridiculousness of the whole scenariostaggering majority favored the ban. While they
surrounding the decision in British Columbia.did disclose that only 800 people from around the
The moratorium on grizzly bears in Alberta wasprovince (which has a population of over 4 million)
not spearheaded by a coalition of environmentalwere polled, they forgot to add how many from
groups who believe in preservation at all costs. Oneach area were included. They did disclose that
the contrary, it seems as if some of the morefive "areas" of British Columbia were included in
famous, if less reputable, groups such as thethe survey, but left out the fact that three of
World Wildlife Fund were totally in the dark aboutthe five were major metropolitan areas whose
the decision. As late as October of 2006, thepopulation are made up mostly of people who had
WWF was sponsoring update shows on manyprobably never seen a grizzly bear, much less
stations wherein Kelsey Grammar called the policyventured into the wilderness areas they occupied.
regarding the grizzly bear hunt in Alberta intoComments by survey director Conrad Winn
question. It looks like the WWF missed the bulletinfurther clarified his institution's approach to the
about the new policy.study, as he suggested that the group only
The hunt in British Columbia was a differentsurveyed people who had recently moved to B.C
matter entirely. The ban came about on the evefrom the east.
of an election that was to see the annihilation ofWilderness hunting outfitters in Canada and
the highly unpopular New Democrat Party. In aoutdoor enthusiasts breathed a sigh of relief when
last ditch attempt to gain some votes, Premierthe Liberals came into power and immediately
Ujal Dosanjh suddenly announced a moratorium onlifted the ban. The province currently sees 400
the grizzly bear hunt, a program that brought ingrizzlies a year harvested, with 60% being taken
huge amounts of money from foreign huntersby resident hunters and the other 40% taken by
and which was needed to keep the grizzlyforeign big game hunters, who make a major
population in check. The move was quicklycontribution to the province's economy. Bear
overturned when the Liberal party swept intoexperts suggest grizzlies continue to thrive in the
power, and has been kept in place ever since.province, with suggestions that in order to even
Among the issues that stand out when reactionkeep the bear numbers even, the hunt would
to the two provinces' policies from environmentalneed to be doubled. With the current harvest,
groups is considered is how very little input andmany believe that grizzly numbers will continue to
reaction there was on the Alberta front.grow, with the potential of more bear/human
Environmental groups suggested at the time ofconflicts, livestock predation, and lower numbers
the B.C. ban that grizzly populations in the entireof wild ungulates as some of the results. As
province were as low as 4,000 bears (this was ingrizzly bears are highly aggressive to their own
contrast to the government numbers of 10,000,species, more numbers of mature male bears
which in turn were low compared to biologistmight mean that less sows and cubs are left alive
counts which put the number of grizzlies at 12,000at the end of each season due to male kill rates
or higher). Best estimates from all sides puts the(one study showed that in three weeks, one
number of grizzlies in Alberta at only 700, a figureAlpha male was responsible for killing and eating
that is staggeringly low when one considers that itnine other grizzlies in his range; three sows and
includes the healthy grizzly populations of Banfftheir cubs of the year).
and Jasper National Parks. One can only assumeIt is the responsibility of every outdoor enthusiast
that environmental groups missed their researchto protect the nature and the animals that remind
on the desperate situation of the grizzlies inof why we love the outdoors. As the ludicrous
Alberta, where about ten grizzlies were takensituation in B.C. demonstrated, however, all people
each year previous to the ban.truly interested in keeping the wild, 'wild' must
Another stand-out issue in the B.C. ban was theapproach controversial matters in an informed
incredible callousness of pollsters andmanner, with a willingness to learn from the facts.