Discover the Savary Island


Grizzly Bear Hunting Moratoriums in Canada

In March of 2006, the government of Albertathe incredible callousness of pollsters and
imposed a ban on the hunting of grizzly bearsenvironmental groups alike when it came to
for sport. The move showed a considerablepublishing the truth in order to truly
lack of reaction when compared to a similarmeasure public opinion. When commissioned by
ban by British Columbia in 2001, and indeed athe International Fund for Animal Welfare to
comparison of the actions in the twopoll people's reaction to the ban, COMPASS
provinces sheds a lot of light on thedirectors acted shocked when the numbers
ridiculousness of the whole scenarioreflected a staggering majority favored the
surrounding the decision in British Columbia.ban. While they did disclose that only 800
people from around the province (which has a
The moratorium on grizzly bears in Albertapopulation of over 4 million) were polled,
was not spearheaded by a coalition ofthey forgot to add how many from each area
environmental groups who believe inwere included. They did disclose that five
preservation at all costs. On the contrary,"areas" of British Columbia were included in
it seems as if some of the more famous, ifthe survey, but left out the fact that three
less reputable, groups such as the Worldof the five were major metropolitan areas
Wildlife Fund were totally in the dark aboutwhose population are made up mostly of
the decision. As late as October of 2006, thepeople who had probably never seen a grizzly
WWF was sponsoring update shows on manybear, much less ventured into the wilderness
stations wherein Kelsey Grammar called theareas they occupied. Comments by survey
policy regarding the grizzly bear hunt indirector Conrad Winn further clarified his
Alberta into question. It looks like the WWFinstitution's approach to the study, as he
missed  the  bulletin  about  the new policy.suggested that the group only surveyed people
who  had recently moved to B.C from the east.
The hunt in British Columbia was a different
matter entirely. The ban came about on theWilderness hunting outfitters in Canada and
eve of an election that was to see theoutdoor enthusiasts breathed a sigh of relief
annihilation of the highly unpopular Newwhen the Liberals came into power and
Democrat Party. In a last ditch attempt toimmediately lifted the ban. The province
gain some votes, Premier Ujal Dosanjhcurrently sees 400 grizzlies a year
suddenly announced a moratorium on theharvested, with 60% being taken by resident
grizzly bear hunt, a program that brought inhunters and the other 40% taken by foreign
huge amounts of money from foreign huntersbig game hunters, who make a major
and which was needed to keep the grizzlycontribution to the province's economy. Bear
population in check. The move was quicklyexperts suggest grizzlies continue to thrive
overturned when the Liberal party swept intoin the province, with suggestions that in
power, and has been kept in place ever since.order to even keep the bear numbers even, the
hunt would need to be doubled. With the
Among the issues that stand out when reactioncurrent harvest, many believe that grizzly
to the two provinces' policies fromnumbers will continue to grow, with the
environmental groups is considered is howpotential of more bear/human conflicts,
very little input and reaction there was onlivestock predation, and lower numbers of
the Alberta front. Environmental groupswild ungulates as some of the results. As
suggested at the time of the B.C. ban thatgrizzly bears are highly aggressive to their
grizzly populations in the entire provinceown species, more numbers of mature male
were as low as 4,000 bears (this was inbears might mean that less sows and cubs are
contrast to the government numbers of 10,000,left alive at the end of each season due to
which in turn were low compared to biologistmale kill rates (one study showed that in
counts which put the number of grizzlies atthree weeks, one Alpha male was responsible
12,000 or higher). Best estimates from allfor killing and eating nine other grizzlies
sides puts the number of grizzlies in Albertain his range; three sows and their cubs of
at only 700, a figure that is staggeringlythe  year).
low when one considers that it includes the
healthy grizzly populations of Banff andIt is the responsibility of every outdoor
Jasper National Parks. One can only assumeenthusiast to protect the nature and the
that environmental groups missed theiranimals that remind of why we love the
research on the desperate situation of theoutdoors. As the ludicrous situation in B.C.
grizzlies in Alberta, where about tendemonstrated, however, all people truly
grizzlies were taken each year previous tointerested in keeping the wild, 'wild' must
the  ban.approach controversial matters in an informed
manner, with a willingness to learn from the
Another stand-out issue in the B.C. ban wasfacts.



1 A B C D E F 79 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 98 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130