The Future of Voiceovers: Hold Your Tongue...Possibly Forever

"Do we need to cast a voice-over talent for thisensemble. The Bots have released two CDs, a
project?"That's a valid question any producer'record deal' with Magnatune, and a second video
might ask when creating an advertisement,in the works. It's been a long and painful ordeal,
corporate audio-video presentation, video game,but I've finally gotten them to the point where
etc. Of course, the answer depends on whatthey seem as real as any other band out
elements the producer and client feel will bestthere--except no live concerts."I've Gotta SingAnd
communicate with the audience.For a radio ad, athat's the crux of the matter. The appeal of
fully sung jingle with no voice-over could workvirtual entertainers probably will be quite limited--at
best. A TV spot or corporate narration might beleast for the foreseeable future--because they
most effective using scrolling graphic and text,can't tour, do drugs, get into fights, sue their
again without an announcer. But very soonrecord labels, promote world peace, raise money
producers could be pondering whether theirfor charity, or do anything live flesh and blood
productions need a voice over talent for a moreperformers can do. We, the audience, love the
disturbing reason. Vocal utterances produced byperformer as much as the performer's music.
air passing through folds of tissue and formed byAnd, in this case, that's a good thing. Tony
lips, teeth, and tongue may, simply put, becomeBennett, the White Stripes, Diana Krall, Toby
obsolete. Yes, the "virtual voice talent" may veryKeith, Frederica von Stade, and all of the
well become a reality.Welcome to the MachineInAmerican Idol wannabes are quite safe from
the May 2004 issue of Mix Magazine, in twoVocaloid elimination.Speak Now of Forever Hold
separate articles, Stephen St. Croix and Paul D.Your PeaceBut voice over talents may not be so
Lehrman relate their experiences with a newlucky. Voice talents are not seen. They don't have
piece of software ominously named "Vocaloid."adoring fans, except their moms and, maybe, a
This little computer-coded wonder is a speechfew other voice-over talents. They perform in
synthesizer that's being used to synthesizeshort increments: 30 seconds, 60 seconds, a 30
background vocals on actual recordings that areminute narration on how to make a million in real
being sold to the public--background vocals soestate. If speech synthesis has reached a point of
good, you'd be hard-pressed to recognize they'resophistication sufficient enough to create virtual
fake singers. Now, considering the dubious singingsingers, what's to prevent a software genius
talents of many of our current pop stars, maybefrom developing a program to replace voice
a Vocaloid virtual diva named Britney isn't tootalent? Write the program.Sample 300 to 500
far-fetched. Audio manipulation, including pitchvoices, male and female, each with unique
correction, equalization, compression, reverb, havecharacteristics, incorporate them into the
been used for decades to save the bacon ofsoftware and, voila, Instant Announcer in a Box.
many a pop star's performance in-studio or onJust load your script text into the program, which
stage. Technically, it's just a short step from thisconverts the text to perfectly uttered speech. No
point to a "singer in a box."In fact, in the lettersretakes. With a few clicks of the mouse to
section of the July 2004 issue of Mix Magazine atweak inflection, emphasis, pacing, dynamics, etc.
person identified only as "BC," referring to the St.to polish the natural feel of the voice-over and
Croix and Lehrman articles, boasted that he'syou're done.Far-fetched? If entertainment's got a
created a "band" called The Bots, "...created whollyvirtual band call The Bots, why can't advertising
from speech synthesizers and 3-D graphics." BCand marketing have its own virtual Don
further states, "I use Vocaloid among a variety ofPardo?Well, it seems maybe they can...
other speech synths to make it more into an